milimirror.blogg.se

“Robert God­dard, the fa­ther of mod­ern rock­et pro­pul­sion, en­dured rid­i­cule and de­ri­sion from his con­tem­po­rary sci­en­tif­ic peers who stat­ed his ide­as were lu­di­crous and im­pos­si­ble,” they not­ed as an ex­am­ple, in a re­port on their find­ings. It’s time to fig­ure out ways to put a stop to this, they say. The study is im­por­tant, they con­tin­ue, be­cause so­ci­e­ty lov­ing­ly ex­pends re­sources to fos­ter cre­ativ­ity in each new gener­ation-then of­ten turns around and squash­es the new ide­as that re­sult. Our love of cre­ativ­ity is what we pro­fess in pub­lic-but our dread of it is what we tend to hide from the world, and of­ten even from our­selves, they add. One of many scien­tists ri­di­culed in his time for work now con­sid­ered sem­i­nal-the Ameri­can phys­i­cist Rob­ert God­dard (1882-1945)

The prob­lem that per­haps most in­ter­feres with our rec­og­ni­tion and ap­preci­ation for real-life cre­ativ­ity, they claim, is that cre­ativ­ity usu­al­ly comes with a side dish of un­cer­tain­ty: Will this new idea ac­tu­al­ly work? What will peo­ple think of me if I ac­cept it? Mueller of the Uni­vers­ity of Penn­syl­va­nia and col­leagues, who con­ducted the work, say their study both demon­strates and helps ex­plain the phe­nom­e­non. In which case you'd think that organizations such as the WHO, the UN, and the EU would have picked up on the dire state of global consciousness, and that they would have launced the kind of global intervention they pride them self on to spark the imagination of humanity, or something.Jen­ni­fer S. While most us us pro­fess to love cre­ativ­ity we re­coil when it stares us in the face ac­cord­ing to the study that seems to seems lodge a qui­et in­dict­ment against the whole of the hu­man race. 12, 2011 article published in World Science, a human bias against creativity was hindering our collective scientific advancement. Thank you and welcome to my aware, abate in our mutual becomeĬJ aka 101aware to the Dec.